Tuesday, January 21, 2014

ERP FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

ERP FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are core software programs developed for use by corporations to help them integrate their information system for each and every area of the business. ERP programs are designed to bring and create a common database out of many that are available to them ,to manage a single business process. A business process can be defined as a set of collective activities that takes inputs gathered for processing and delivers output in the form of a report or forecasting of some sort , which becomes meaningful to the user. ERP software’s when integrated supports the most efficient operation any kind of business process by seamlessly integrating various tasks such as marketing and sales , production , transportation and logistics , Accounting and finance , human resource and staffing to name  a few.Moreover ERP brings Automation to most of the processes involved .
But to implement a fully automated ERP platform an organisation needs better trained staff which has the requisite knowledge of using it to derive maximum benefit.
Caution
Having said that the real problem lies in the selection and integration of the ERP in the Long Run. It’s a very arduous task  and the possibility of failing is quite high. What an organisation can and must do in such a scenario is to find the right people to handle the ERP system. There are at least three basic  parameters to be fulfilled to manage  ERP in the best possible manner.  People are at the forefront, then the existing processes and then of course the technology involved. ERP is always a change that’s required but People involved in this needs to be trained so that they understand the change and implement it wholeheartedly.
The financial benefits of an ERP system is always pretty daunting to calculate because sometimes ERP increases sales and decreases expenditure in many ways which can’t be measured in the normal manner. Similarly there will be changes over a long period of time and can’t be tracked and be converted into figures . So there is every chance that initially ERP will be resented by some.
But ERP overall changes the group dynamics and bring very radical ideas to the table.The overall advantages brought in by ERP can be analysed from the following real life cases:

ERP Allows for Expansions
Au Bon Pain, the bakery and café chain based in Boston, operates 200 outlets in the United States and Asia. Over the last three years, Health magazine has named Au Bon Pain one of America’s top five healthiest fast-food restaurant chains. The company had an interest in expanding, and Tim Oliveri, the company’s chief financial officer, wanted Au Bon Pain to be able to react to market changes more rapidly while also reducing its costs.
The company’s existing information systems were holding it back, but the company decided to bring in a new SAP ERP system and helped itself  to achieve these goals.The new ERP system replaced disparate systems, some of which were in paper format. This integrated enterprise system brings the storefront to the back office through a number of different module implementations. With the single system, the company is able to reduce its financial reporting cycle from weeks to days, and the system allows better management of its  workforce through a Web-based portal. In addition, the new system facilitates greater compliance with financial regulations and better sales management, along with the electronic purchasing of all raw materials.
One impetus for installing this ERP system was for management to be able to analyse and digest information on market conditions, and react quickly to open new stores or renovate existing stores. For example, cafés in New York City have recently undergone major renovations, resulting in double-digit sales increases. More cafes are planned to open soon.

Sales and Operations Planning (SOP)
Sales and operations planning (SOP) is typically used in for-profit manufacturing organizations; however it can be applied to others as well.
For example, the non-profit America’s Blood Centres is a network of more than 600 donor centres supplying over 3,500 hospitals and healthcare facilities in North America.
As with any business, a blood centre must quickly identify variations in forecasted supply and demand and take action to lessen the potential negative effects of those variations. For instance, if the demand for SDPs at a blood centre falls below projections, “the excess SDPs may be exported if they have sufficient shelf life remaining, or donors may be rescheduled to reduce supply. If SDP demand spikes, recruitment and collections may have to work overtime to recruit more donors.”
Blood banks may not be for-profit companies, but they cannot operate at a loss either. By using measurements, such as RONA (return on net assets), a blood centre can help blood centres avoid situations in which “the cost per unit (CPU) collected is higher than the sales cost of a unit to the health care provider or what an imported unit would cost.”
One of the major challenges to applying the sales and operations planning process to blood banks is data accuracy. The authors note that it is not uncommon to have data inconsistencies between the blood management system and the financial system. Without accurate and consistent data, the results of the sales and operations planning process would not be valid.
Solving Complexities of Supply Chain Management with ERP
Over the last few decades, a number of industry trends have focused on making supply chains more efficient and effective. The first of these started in the 1980s when techniques developed at the Toyota Motor Company, now commonly referred to as lean manufacturing, started to be accepted and copied by companies around the world. The main idea embodied in lean manufacturing or the Toyota Production System (TPS) is that waste must be eliminated. The TPS identified inventory resulting from “overproduction” as waste. Much of industrial practice, especially in the United States, was focused on the idea that efficiency should be measured by having each machine produce to its maximum capacity. The TPS approach was that a company should produce exactly what is required when it is required. The TPS emphasized “pull” systems, where customer demand triggers production, rather than “push” systems, where planning methods like MRP are frequently used to push material through the supply chain to the customer in anticipation of demand.
A second important trend has been a decrease in vertical integration of companies. It means  the extent to which a company produces the components and assemblies used in the products it manufactures.
A third trend is supply base rationalization, an effort to determine the “appropriate” number of suppliers a company should have. Many large firms have thousands of suppliers. However, the rationalization concept says that better supplier relationships can be developed when there are fewer suppliers to manage, and costs will be reduced when a smaller number of suppliers have higher production volumes. In 2008, Ford’s Senior Vice President of Global Purchasing announced that Ford would be reducing its supply base from over 2,000 suppliers to 700 to 800 over a period of years.
These trends—lean manufacturing, reduced vertical integration, and supply base rationalization—have been implemented by manufacturers in a number of industries over the past 30 years and have resulted in higher efficiencies and reduced cost.
Japanese-based companies such as Toyota were obviously affected by disruptions from time to time, but the integrated nature of global supply chains meant that the effect of the earthquake rippled throughout the world. For example, the three largest shipbuilders in the world are located in Korea and are dependent on Japanese steel, and the Japanese steel industry was significantly impacted by the Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster, which was triggered by the tsunami that followed the earthquake.
Toyota is now planning to lead the way in reducing supply chain risk. In September 2011, they announced plans to  create a robust supply chain that would recover within two weeks in the event of another massive disruption. This plan consists of three fundamental steps. First, Toyota intends to push for further standardization of parts across Japanese automakers so they can share common components, which could, in turn, be manufactured in several locations. The second element in the plan is the development of technology that would provide more options for parts that require unique materials or components that are only available from one source. Finally, Toyota plans to make each region in the world independent in its parts procurement so that a disaster in Japan would not affect production overseas & vice versa.
Conclusions
Today’s Managers think in terms of Business processes integrating all the related functional areas and bringing in efficacy & competitiveness. To integrate and cooperate all the things, there is need for sharing of information between various platforms and relates partners.ERP brings these capacity by integrating all the different sources of information to a common information platform. for example when Marketing and sales people use the same data platform ,efficiency will kick in. There are various fundamental changes happening in the ERP sector as envisaged by the TOYOTA example. The need for doing business in a coherent manner gives rise to new innovations each and every day.
Technologies such as radio frequency identification (RFID) and smartphones are fueling explosive growth in the amount of data available for businesses to process. This data can provide real business value, but the challenge is how to manage and evaluate this data to gain business knowledge. Business intelligence (BI) tools are growing in sophistication and power. Technologies such  as in-memory computing will provide greater speed and flexibility to BI users and will increase the number of employees in a company that can make use of BI.
Mobile computing technology is increasing the use of ERP and BI data by making it more convenient to access data when and where it is needed.  Cloud computing has also come in which is the delivery of a software product to a user via the Internet. The user typically accesses the cloud product through a Web browser or a lightweight (meaning small and simple) application for a computer or mobile device.
All these innovations while being essential and required for cutting edge technology in sales and Marketing they also bring in the advantage of First Mover into the industry. Those who foresees the importance of them earlier than others reaps the benefit more than anybody else in the Market. One has to not only move ahead to fuel growth and sustainability but has to constantly endeavour to remain that way. Unless corporations find newer methods and programmes to redesign and redevelop the competitive advantage can be frivolous in the long Run.

References
1. http://scn.sap.com/community/erp/blog/2013/03/11/a-new-application-that-makes-it-easier-to-find-sap-correction-notes(Kristen Scheffler) March 11,2013
3. ERP demystified by Alexis Leon Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2008

4. ERP: Making It Happen: The Implementers' Guide to Success with Enterprise  By Thomas F. Wallace 2001

5. Enterprise Resource Planning  By Bret Wagner, Ellen Monk,2008




ACCOUNTING FRAUD AT SATYAM COMPUTERS

ACCOUNTING FRAUD AT SATYAM COMPUTERS
OVERVIEW OF THE COMPANY

Satyam Computers Services Limited (SCSL) was registered as a PVT Ltd organisation in AP in the year 1987. Soon in the year 1991 it became a Limited Company. It became the fourth largest IT services company in India and in the year 1995 it received a certification for ISO 9001. Satyam computers offered a large no of services and expertise in the fields of Development of software’s , System Embedment , various Engineering Services such as CAD and CAM , ERP management , EAI ,CRM ,SCM,E-Commerce and Consulting.  In the year 2001, the company was given IMC Ramkrishna Bajaj National Award for its contribution in the field of Service.
In the year 2002 company expanded its operations into China. In the same year Satyam was cited as 'Top choice for SAP support' by Giga Research group. In 2003 the Group announced a new business center in Singapore and also launched a Global solution center. Satyam was given the prestigious IBM Lotus award for its innovative knowledge & content management solutions in the year 2003. It was also given an Outsourcing contract by WORLD BANK worth $15 million in 2003. It inaugurated a new development center in Mississauga, Canada in 2004. Satyam also acquired Citisoft Plc a UK based company and Dynamics, a leading data warehousing company in Singapore in the year 2005. In 2006 Satyam received the best performing stock from CNBC and Excellence in cost management from ICWAI. In the year 2007, Satyam acquired Nitor Global Solutions Ltd, a UK based company in a deal worth $5.5 million. In the same year it established a new development centre in Brisbane to support the fields of Local Governance, insurance, mining and Finance. Satyam was the proud winner of Corporate Social Responsibility Award in ASIA under the poverty alleviation category. In the year 2008, Satyam Computers (SCSL) became the first company registered in India to list its American Depository Receipts or Shares (ADR) on NYSE and Euronext in Amsterdam. (I M Pandey-2013)

HOW THINGS TURNED OUT ?

SCSL had many fortune 500 companies as clients including Unilever, Nestlé ,Cisco, GE, Sony, World Bank,  GM, United States government etc. in quite a few case SCSL had even a role in the maintenance of its  client companies accounting and finances.
The fraud unveiled at SCSL was India’s largest corporate scandal till date and the first casualty in the wake of Global financial meltdown in 2007-2008. But before the fraud was detected and made public Satyam was always under close scrutiny and watch of concerned agencies for various conflicting reports and seemingly ill directed activities.   

In early October 2008 there was a  report that the company was immediately banned from any further World Bank contracts , when it was reportedly found to have installed spy software’s and cameras in some of the World Banks computers. Saytam denied but late it was confirmed by the Bank In December 2008, Satyam’s shareholders revolted the news that the company has agreed to buy two entities which allegedly had ties to the incumbent Chairman and his Son.  By the end of the year 2008 , the board of directors refused to back the chairman and the CEO on the matter and four Board members resigned by February  2009.

The books of Accounts of Satyam was audited for the last many years by PriceWaterCooper (PwC) and they just overlooked somehow the underlined fraud.
This accounting fraud looked very obvious and basic when the then chairman and Satyam’s founder, Mr Ramalinga Raju admitted (Rishi Mehra -2011) the following facets about the Balance Sheet dated 30th Sept 2008:
(a) About Rs 5040 crores which consisted of almost 95% of the cash at bank as on Sept’08 was fictitious, because of largely inflated profit margins and lots of fictitious Assets.
(b)    There was an item under the heading of Current Assets called accrued interest  to the tune of  Rs. 376 crore which  did not exist and just fabricated.
(c)     There was an understatement of a particular liability to the tune of Rs 1230 crores, which was on account of funds arranged by him and the promoter’s family.
(d)    The balance sheet also showed Debtors position to be in excess by atleast Rs. 490 crore.

It was strange that the extraordinarily large fictitious cash pile of bank deposits claimed by successive Balance sheets were never verified properly and its existence on a long term basis raised enough doubt about the quality of the audit done by internationally known Auditors. At the same time it was also surprising for everybody that the Board of Directors which consisted of very highly skilled and experienced individuals  did nothing substantial to avert the potentially damning situation.

The first level of corporate governance in a company is its board of directors itself and in case of SCSL the board comprised of very big names including Mr Vinod Dham who worked with INTERL corporation, professor Krishna Palepu of HBS and former Cabinet Secretary TR Prasad. It was intriguing that such an assembly of the intellect could not detect the fraud while it was going on .
This scandal also raised questions about the way outsourcing companies are being regulated and particularly audited. The failure of regulatory authority was so complete that it was joked that a blind and deaf man would have easily found it, if he wanted it to.
Starting in the financial year 2006, Mr B Ramalinga Raju raised money by hypothecating or pledging his family’s shareholding in the company which was little over 8% to outside lenders to secure collateral loans. He then reinvested the money so garnered back into the company to cover up the shortfall of revenue and profits.  Then the Global financial meltdown happened, share prices  fell by more than 40% and thus Lenders became jittery and began selling the collateral . This aggravated the already grim situation and at this juncture B Ramalinga Raju tried to buy two other companies promoted by the family into Satyam’s fold for a reported $1.6 billion. This could have wiped the fictitious assets such as cash and had the potential to bring more assets into the fold but the scheme could not go through because of staunch resistance from lenders as well as other investors (particularly institutional investors).
Indian Stock market Regulator (SEBI) launched an investigation into the fraud in December 2008 .At the same time US Authorities raised objections and concerns with the statutory Auditor Price Waterhouse, whose parent company was listed in US , regarding its audit of Satyam,after their visit to the company headquarters in early 2009.
According to Mr B Ramalinga Raju, the cover-up was started as an attempt to keep under disguise the poor Quarterly results of the company. In a letter to the Board of Directors of the company in Early January 2009 he clearly admitted to inflating the latest quarterly result that the company came out with in SEPTEMBER 2008. He admitted that in that Quarter the company reported a revenue of 2700 crores and an operating profit (EBIT) of 649 crores amounting to almost 24% margin where as the actual results were a revenue of 2217 crores and an operating profit (EBIT) of 61  crores only which amounted to only 3% margin. This resulted in an artificial cash inflow of almost 588 crores in the Q2 of 2008-2009 FY.

Fabricated Balance Sheet and Income (P/L Account) Statement of Satyam: As of September 30, 2008
                                                (Rs. in crore)
 Actual       Reported    Difference
Cash and Bank Balances               321           5,361        5,040
Accrued Interest on bank FDs        Nil             376.5        376
Understated Liability                    1,230        None         1,230
Overstated Debtors                      2,161        2,651        490
Total                                         Nil             Nil             7,136
Revenues (Q2 FY 2009)                2,112        2,700        588
Operating Profits                         61             649           588
When further audit were done later it was found out that only the operations of SCSL was continued to be exaggerated and not the same was done with any of the subsidiaries. Over a period of last one year alone revenues were shown in excess by 3,000 crores (Actual  8,392 crores and shown as 11,276 crores) and reserves were inflated as well.
Because of the staggering amount of difference between these two figures , the company had to carry some additional resources and various other non operational assets to justify the exaggerated amount of operations in case there is a probe and thus the operating costs got bigger by the day and accentuated the matter further.
Every attempt was made to reduce and even completely eliminate the gap. But they failed. Because the promoters only held 8% of the stock , they feared the failure to increase revenue will lead to the company being taken over and thus they tried in a last ditch attempt to infuse more assets and slush out the nonexistent cash by bringing in some from outside. That’s when they tried to buy the family owned Maytas infrastructure to its fold and infuse cash. Once Satyams problem was solved they can settle for cash to paid to Maytas, and more importantly the can be made much later without burdening the cash flows. But others resisted.
Immediately after the confessions made by Raju the shares of the plunged  by 80%  from a high of Rs 544 in may 208 to Rs 11.50 in January 2009. In NYSE , Satyam’s  shares was selling at $29.10 in july 2008 but by contrast in March 2009 they drastically fell to US $1.80. This amounted to investors losing more than $2.82 billion in investment.(BBC News, 2009).

WHO WAS IMPLICATED?
a. B. Ramalinga Raju (chairman): He claimed in his letter to the Board that nobody else was aware of the fraud and particularly BOARD was innocent.
b. Audit Firm PwC.
This Audit firm audited Satyam’s books starting from the year 2000 till 2009. Several experts criticized the auditors in very harsh words  for failing to detect the fraud particularly the existing non-interest-bearing deposits of more than $1 billion.
According to many professionals, any worthwhile auditing firm would have discovered and questioned the logic behind having such an enormous amount in non-interest bearing assets.  This should have been seen as a red flag by PWC and it failed to do so. Further, it was apparent that the  auditors did not independently try to verify for a few years with the banks in which the management of Satyam claimed to have these deposits” (Blakely, 2009).
c. DSP Merrill Lynch: This US company advised Satyam for the last ten years regarding issue of new shares and reportedly helped the company’s listing in US.

WHO THE SCANDAL AFFECTED?


Immediately following the declaration by Raju of the fraud, Merrill Lynch terminated its contract  with SCSL , Credit Suisse relegated SCSL to third tier and the license of PWC to operate in India was revoked. All the awards given bestowed on SCSL was stripped off (Agarwal and Sharma, 2009).

Some of the parties affected by the scam, according to Manoharan (2011), were:
• More than 60,000 Employees of Satyam dealt with nightmares, non payment of salaries, the spectrum of losing their jobs.
• Clients of Satyam seemed to lost their Trust in SCSL. Many fortune 500 clients like  Cisco, Telstra and World Bank cancelled their contracts with immediate effect.
• Shareholders who lost their investments lost faith in the system.
• Bankers and lenders were on tenterhooks for the timely recovery of their claims and a possible financial and non-financial exposure.

HOW IT COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED?

Accounting frauds are related to manipulative financial reporting with intentional misstatement, missing correct figures knowingly and failing to disclose information correctly and with the sole intention of deceiving the end users. The world has seen its share of accounting frauds but they can be avoided with the help of following precautions:

1.  People in charge must understand in general why employees or managerial personnel create fraudulent behaviour and take part in financial frauds. People commit some because they are under pressure or they do it to relieve pressure without getting caught and have justification to make a fraud. Better internal controls and fine leadership will mitigate the problem.

2. Internal control and audit: 
Internal audits are a constant operation to contain frauds and helps evaluating the processes more precisely and thus assessing the procedures to see whether the control systems in place are adequate or not. If necessary they bring to light the needs of revision and solutions.

3.  Whistleblower Program or internal Watch

In every organisation employees must be encouraged to voice their opinion to a designated committee or seniors. And at the same time it shall be ensured that the grievances are heard and dealt with. If somebody brings up or notices an unethical behaviour , he/she must not be punished. That way internal watch works.


4. Independent Audit

Frauds made by low level employees can be detected through internal audits and higher management checks. But it’s difficult catch the big guns by internal audit alone. Thus there is a need to have independent auditors to check senior management and tricky transactions. 
5. Minimize cash transactions: 
This thing is of utmost importance. Each company shall demarcate the policy by which employees are allowed to handle cash themselves. If the amount exceeds the denoted one then they must get seniors  approval to do it. And in case of directors and others a disclosure to the BOARD of DIRECTORS is a must. At no instance a person disbursing cash shall be from the person in charge of Accounts.

6. Reconcile various Accounts regularly: the Auditors must audit and make reconciliation of statements of cash and bank balances physically and must make sure there is no discrepancy in them. All the bank accounts and credit transactions be reconciled and reported. 

7. Surprise Audits and checks:  Audit committees and independent Auditors must conduct surprise audits of Books of Accounts and transactions which occur more discretely. Surprise checks shall also be conducted for Different branches and offices regularly to keep fraudsters under check.

In more instances internal Employees and officers are the ones who indulge in frauds. This happens because of the oversights on the part of the management and auditors and also because of the lack of internal controls in place.


CONCLUSIONS

The management culture at Satyam, when it was dominated by one man , that of their chairman , symbolized an unethical corporate culture. He not only disregarded but also manipulated the BOD. There was urge on his part to impress the investor and thus compelled him to fudge the results. He was under pressure. But at the same time the independent experts sitting at the Board turned a blind eye to what’s happening around them and did not have a clue.  The board almost connived with his actions and turned itself to a blind spectator, where as they shall have seen the real picture and rectified or advised the true sense into it; the lure of big and fat salary and other form of compensations further encouraged such behaviour. In the end they allowed their behaviour to have destroyed the trust of the investors and the image of nation as well.

Michael Useem, management professor at Wharton noted that Satyam case was little bit unusual in a way that it is listed in NYSE. It’s difficult to get funding at low cost in India thus there was this necessity to issue ADRS in US Market. By entering into the US market Satyam accepted the possibility of greater scrutiny and higher amount ethical governance yet the scandal happened at the company. According to his opinion the issue was indeed disturbing.
But Indian IT sector has come a long way since and overcome the inadvertent situation tactically by being more transparent.

In the month of June ,2009, the company named itself Mahindra Satyam after it was taken over after a SEBI led well rounded bidding process by the MAHINDRA GROUP in the month of April ,2009.Finally the company merged into the flagship MAHINDRA company TECH MAHINDRA in 2013. The eventual merger was much delayed due to a pending income tax claim of  Rs 2700 crores . When merged the new entity created India’s fifth largest technology company with annual revenue of over $3billion.  



SAMARESH CHHOTRAY